LIDT wavelength-scaling rule of thumb shown to be inaccurate

Aug. 6, 2015
Engineers at Quantel USA set out to measure the laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT) of a substrate at different wavelengths.

Optical catalogs often specify the laser-damage threshold of an optic at only one or two wavelengths. This raises the question: What is the laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT) of that optic at other wavelengths? One rule of thumb that has been proposed is that the LIDT can be scaled by an inverse square-root relationship with wavelength: for example, a LIDT measured to be 10.0 J/cm2 at 1064 nm would scale to 7.07 J/cm2 at 532 nm.

To determine whether or not this rule of thumb is in fact accurate, engineers at Quantel USA (Bozeman, MT), an independent laser-damage testing facility, set out to measure the LIDT of a substrate at different wavelengths. They chose a sapphire substrate with a diameter large enough to allow multiple LIDT tests to be completed on a single surface. The sapphire, which was coated with a dual-band antireflection coating for 1064 nm and 1574 nm, was then subjected to LIDT measurements at both 1064 nm and 1574 nm (see test parameters in the table).

Damage was defined as any permanent laser-induced change observable at 150X magnification with a Nomarski darkfield microscope. The resultant LIDT at 1064 nm was found to be 6.0 J/cm2 (see figure). Using the wavelength scaling equation above, this would correspond to 7.3 J/cm2 at 1574 nm. In fact, the actual measured LIDT at 1574 nm was 15.4 J/cm2, a factor of two higher that the predicted value. The inverse square root relationship was shown to predict a significantly lower LIDT than the actual measured value by more than a factor of two. The Quantel results show that, when needing to determine the LIDT at various wavelengths, the best approach is to measure the LIDT at the wavelengths of interest.

Contact Jason Yager at [email protected].

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Request a free Micro 3D Printed sample part

April 11, 2024
The best way to understand the part quality we can achieve is by seeing it first-hand. Request a free 3D printed high-precision sample part.

How to Tune Servo Systems: The Basics

April 10, 2024
Learn how to tune a servo system using frequency-based tools to meet system specifications by watching our webinar!

Motion Scan and Data Collection Methods for Electro-Optic System Testing

April 10, 2024
Learn how different scanning patterns and approaches can be used in measuring an electro-optic sensor performance, by reading our whitepaper here!

How Precision Motion Systems are Shaping the Future of Semiconductor Manufacturing

March 28, 2024
This article highlights the pivotal role precision motion systems play in supporting the latest semiconductor manufacturing trends.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!